Kenwood Press

Serving the communities of Kenwood, Glen Ellen and Oakmont

email print
Guest Editor: 12/15/2019

Comcast can improve communications during disasters

By Peter Gruchawka

Since 1969 I have been personally involved with the evolution of TV and FM broadcast and emergency services telecommunications networks. I’ve also been involved with cellular telephone since its inception in 1984 in California and public Internet since its inception in 1989. When it comes to emergency communications, they all have their flaws too numerous to address here. I have also had to deal with the downward slide of the PG&E facilities that have been getting progressively worse over the last 30 or so years.

It is now abundantly clear to everyone that during fire, earthquake or other disaster you cannot rely on any government entity or commercial provider to get timely, accurate and meaningful information to you. PG&E outages framed as a “Public Safety Power Shutoff” (PSPS) or power loss due to storm, earthquake, equipment failure or other causes, can and do result in loss of vital communications. Most cell sites have five to eight hours of battery capacity. Some have generators, but cellular providers will not construct their cell sites to “essential services” facilities standards. Landline telephone offices all have batteries and generators, but those systems occasionally fail, as was the case in 2019 October for Frontier.

Comcast, whom many of you rely upon for Internet and telephone service, does not have a backup plan. According to John Gauder, regional senior VP of Comcast, “Xfinity services require commercial power to operate.”

This is not acceptable. There is no reason, other than not wanting to spend the money, that Comcast cannot implement a power backup plan. I have communicated with the offices of Mike Thompson, Mike McGuire and Susan Gorin expressing my concerns and explaining how Comcast can come up with a solution. Internet and telephone customers must demand reliable services during an emergency. The solution is up to you.

Comcast is probably not automatically giving you a refund to reflect your loss of service for approximately 10 days in October alone. Joe Plaugher, field representative for Congressman Mike Thompson was going to communicate with Comcast and request automatic refunds for services not provided by Comcast. I spent 51 minutes with Comcast online chat and phone calls to get a credit. I hope to see a credit of $28.01 for my $78.95 October bill on my next invoice. I suspect not many Comcast customers can face such an ordeal, but it was a matter of principle to me.

But why is it important for all Comcast customers to get a refund? The only way Comcast (outside of intense political pressure) will invest in backup power for their hubs and nodes is if it will cost them less than the revenue lost when they are not providing service. Comcast is gaining at least $28 from each customer in October alone. I have an Internet-only Comcast service; most people pay far more than I do per month to Comcast for not providing service. Comcast service is critical for emergency communications for many. Let’s assume Comcast only has 100,000 customers in Sonoma County – that translates to $2,800,000 in October that Comcast is taking from you and your neighbors and not spending on hardening their network. How many dollars statewide are they “taking” when they do not provide service?

Unlike cell providers, cable companies (in this case Comcast) operate under franchise agreements with the state, county and each city within the county. So the state, county and cities can compel Comcast to provide refunds and fix their service by the threat of soliciting competitors soon, and pulling Comcast’s franchise on the next renewal (Jan. 2, 2028). I know the county and state are relatively powerless with the Federal Communications Commission. The California Public Utilities Commission is useless, but the County Board of Supervisors and state officials do have power over Comcast because of the franchise agreements.

You can, indeed it is incumbent upon you to keep the pressure on your representatives until there is an implemented solution with Comcast. Please routinely ask the people on the contact list below, “Where is my refund for lack of service by Comcast during the fires? What is the specific plan for backup power for the Comcast network? When will it happen?”

Joe Plaugher, field representative for Congressman Mike Thompson (CA-05), 2300 County Center Dr., Santa Rosa, CA 95402

Pat Gilardi, district director for Supervisor Susan Gorin, First District, County of Sonoma, 575 Administration Dr., Room 100A, Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Kerrie Lindecker, district director/communications coordinator for Senator Mike McGuire

Peter Gruchawka lives in Kenwood.

Recently Published:

12/01/2020 - 10 points to consider regarding SDC Specific Plan
11/15/2020 - What is Glen Ellen?
10/15/2020 - Sonoma County defies wildfire public safety standards
10/01/2020 - OVA board should not propose a 25 percent quorum for amending bylaws
07/01/2020 - VOTMA – What we’re for, in good times and bad
03/01/2020 - Who are our homeless in Sonoma County and what are the county’s next steps?
03/01/2020 - Berger remodel now
02/15/2020 - Manage landscape now to be fire-smart and wildlife-friendly
02/01/2020 - Heart full of trails, head full of leave no trace
01/15/2020 - Who’s worse for wildfire mitigation, Gov. Newsom or the PUC’s Johnson?
12/15/2019 - Comcast can improve communications during disasters
12/15/2019 - The poster child for a dreadful cannabis project
11/15/2019 - To park rangers – don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good
11/15/2019 - Marijuana dispensary update
09/15/2019 - Dispensary doesn’t fit with Kenwood’s character
08/15/2019 - FAQs about PG&E Bankruptcy
08/01/2019 - Finding God in the everyday
05/15/2019 - Oakmont Golf cents and sensibility
04/01/2019 - The wrong way to plan for cannabis cultivation
03/15/2019 - Referendum needed on any proposed purchase of Oakmont Golf Club
03/01/2019 - Looking back and moving forward with SDC
02/01/2019 - Sonoma County should protect its residents by abiding by the State SRA Fire Safe Regulations
01/15/2019 - Oakmont East Recreation Center is a sound investment
12/15/2018 - OVA struggles to control escalating East Rec Center costs
12/01/2018 - GEFD – Setting the record straight